#GEARVR PANO2VR ANDROID#
#GEARVR PANO2VR SOFTWARE#
#GEARVR PANO2VR FREE#

#GEARVR PANO2VR ANDROID#

It is in closed beta now, and we are accepting submissions to join the beta team (more info below).Ĭorona VR offers a simple workflow which will allow you to create, view, edit and publish stereoscopic panorama images directly from inside Corona Renderer in the form of virtual tours on mobile VR devices like Samsung Gear VR and on Android & iPhone with Google cardboard.

#GEARVR PANO2VR FREE#

There will be a free and paid version in the future.

Mobile app is developed by, and it will be sold as a separate product by theConstruct as well.

It supports Samsung Gear VR (currently in closed-beta) and Android & iPhone with Google Cardboard (in closed beta soon).

You can do it directly from the Corona Renderer for 3ds Max and C4D.

#GEARVR PANO2VR SOFTWARE#

You do not need to use any additional third party authoring software to create a virtual tour.Simple VR workflow with a mobile phone app which will allow you to create, view and edit Corona VR panoramas and virtual tours.We plan to stay ahead with this popular technology, so we’d like to introduce you to the “Corona VR” project, which is co-developed with the promising young startup .įor those who cannot wait to read in full, here is a summary: New mobile VR devices like Samsung Gear VR or Google’s upcoming DayDream will make it easier than ever to deliver a simple and quality VR experience to everyone. so, I don't know :P Cubes still seems like a better format to me.Good news everyone! Render Legion is working with to provide one-click, integrated solution for distributing virtual reality tours!Ģ016 is shaping up to be the year of Virtual Reality! It has been around for 15+ years, but only now is it finally looking usable and widely accessible. I think the biggest issue becomes filtering at the joining seams but as people have mentioned you can have two stripes that fit together, but with cylindrical you only have two point, the poles. This is what my basic maths skills give me at least. So uh, yeah, cube-mapping has a bit less discrepancy or whatever to call it than cylindrical mapping, and the max discrepancy is just at the four corners of each face while a cylinder has it along the entire top and bottom edge. Use a cube, and fit the sphere in it, at first it seemed to me to be no different as the pole has the same distance to the edge, but, in a cube we project to a different face after 45 degrees, meaning the max discrepancy will be the uh, 3D hypotenuse, minus the radius.ĭ = √( 2r 2 + r 2 ) - r = √( 3r 2 ) - r = √3 * r - r That is the most discrepancy mapped by the cylinder. equirectangular projection, fit it over the sphere and the distance from a pole to the edge of the cylinder will be the radius of the sphere. R = radius of sphere = half height of cylinder = half side of cube = 1ĭ = maximum distance between surface of sphere and mapping

I was thinking about this yesterday, and couldn't make sense of it, then after a bad night's sleep I can write down what I was thinking xDĪ 360 view is a sphere, we want to store the surface of this sphere as something flat, we can easily flatten a cylinder and/or a cube without any distortion while a sphere has to be mapped to either one of those (or something else with the same property).

Gearvr pano2vr